Writing Assignment

For Unit 5, you will read Chapter 5, “Measuring a Society’s Progress” from the sociology
textbook, Sociology—A Global Perspective and then write a multi-paragraph definition essay
that presents your personal definition of happiness as well as discussing whether you have
achieved your definition.

The assignment will require the following paragraphs:

• An introduction paragraph that opens with an attention grabber, follows with context,
and concludes with a well-developed thesis sentence (Thesis statement = claim +

• Two body paragraphs that elaborate on the criteria listed in thesis
• One body paragraph that answers the question: have you met your personal definition

of happiness? Explain how you have or have not met your definition of happiness in this

• Use the MEAL plan to build the body paragraphs:

Main Idea

• Conclusion paragraph that provides a sense of closure on the issue and speaks to the
issue in a more global manner.

This paper focuses on your personal definition of happiness, so it is acceptable to use first
person pronouns.

This paper will require that it be formatted to MLA standards, and a template is provided in
this unit.

Measuring a Society’s Progress

All societies seek to create wellbeing for individuals. The question is not whether societies desire

welfare or not. The fundamental questions are: What does wellbeing mean? How do we measure

it? And how do we use indicators to organize society and its institutions to maximize wellbeing?

Answering these complex questions is a challenging endeavor, especially given the diversity of

values and worldviews around the globe. However, at the center of the essential questions of

development and progress lie the indicators we use as a society to measure wellbeing and

develop policies. As Hazel Henderson, futurist and evolutionary economist, said, “Statistical

indicators are the structural DNA codes of nations. They reflect a society’s values and goals and

become the key drivers of economic and technological choices” (as cited in Salvaris, 2007).

Indicators reveal particular information about society and should embody values that people care

about, or at least should care about. Therefore, if indicators are to drive the policies that push

society in a genuine direction of progress, they should adequately measure wellbeing and


What does GDP Measure?

Gross Domestic Product (GDP) was developed in the United States to manage the Great

Depression (1929 – early 1940s) and the wartime economy. It is simply a measure of how much

money is exchanging hands, a measure of a country’s output in a given year. It was never

developed as a measure of social wellbeing or progress. In 2009, Jon Hall, former head of the

Global Project on Measuring the Progress of Societies at the Organisation for Economic Co-

Operation and Development (OECD), noted, “Somehow, over the last 30-40 years, GDP has

been seen as a measure of progress although it was never developed for that purpose… If GDP

was going up, then everything was fine in our society. GDP has been guiding institutions and

politics. We need to say, ‘No, GDP is not a measure of progress.’ It is one measure of progress

perhaps, but there are many other things to think about.” Expert and professor of political science

at Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Surat Horachaikul added, “How can we summarize

something as complex as the progress and wellbeing of society in one single number like GDP?

GDP fails to capture many of the components of a true wellbeing society” (personal

communication, July 15, 2009).

Over the years, the world has developed what Joseph Stiglitz, Professor of Economics, Columbia

University, calls “GDP fetishism,” a dogmatic fixation on GDP as a measure of progress. As a

result, institutions and policies have revolved around maximizing GDP with little regard for what

that means for individuals’ standard of living and for social and environmental wellbeing.

Alternatives to GDP

If GDP is not an appropriate measure of wellbeing and progress, then what is? Questioning GDP

means asking the questions: What do we care about as a society? What does wellbeing mean for

us? As Stiglitz (2009) asserted, “We need to open a national dialogue that sheds light on what

values are important to society, and then create metrics that reflect this and are used by decision-

makers.” This dialogue is not an easy one to have, but it is definitely a fruitful one. If more

holistic, comprehensive, and sustainable indicators are to emerge, what variables should be used?

Who decides what these variables are? How is the information that the indicator reveals used by



Gross National Happiness in Bhutan

Bhutan is a country about the size of Switzerland located on the eastern ridges of the Himalayas.

Located between the Assam-Bengal Plain of India and the Plateau of Tibet of southwestern

China, the country has a population of approximately 682,000. In 2008, it shifted from being an

absolute monarchy to a multiparty parliamentary democracy. Seventy percent of people live in

rural areas and mostly farm for a living, although like in many other countries, rural to urban

migration is a growing trend in Bhutan.

The concept of Gross National Happiness (GNH) was first introduced in 1972 by the fourth King

of Bhutan, H.M. Jigme Singye Wangchuck. For years following the introduction of the concept,

GNH served as a guiding philosophy for the absolute monarchy based on four pillars:

• Equitable Economic Development
• Environmental Preservation
• Cultural Resilience
• Good Governance

Having absolute power, the King used the four pillars of GNH to guide the construction and

implementation of policies in Bhutan. In recent years, however, with more Bhutanese students

pursuing education in India, the United States, and elsewhere, and with Bhutan slowly opening

up to the world, the concept of GNH has been scrutinized and sometimes criticized for not being

measurable or statistically sound. GNH first came to public global attention in 1987 when, in an

interview in Bhutan, King Jigme Singye Wangchuck told John Elliott of the Financial Times,

“We are convinced that we must aim for contentment and happiness . . .(because even if we)

raise the per capita income and increase prosperity (it) is not going to guarantee that happiness,

which includes political stability, social harmony, and the Bhutanese culture and way of life” (p.


As a way of integrating the scientific methods of industrialized nations, the Center for Bhutan

Studies (CBS) has developed a GNH index from the research of a team that culminated in the

first GNH questionnaire in 2005 (T. Zangmo, personal communication, July 24, 2009). The most

recent GNH questionnaire focused on nine areas:

• Psychological Wellbeing
• Time Use
• Community Vitality
• Cultural Diversity and Resilience
• Health
• Education
• Ecological Diversity and Resilience
• Living Standard
• Good Governance


“As collective happiness is the main goal of a GNH society, psychological wellbeing is of

primary importance in gauging the success of the state in providing appropriate policies and

services” (Ura, 2008). The psychological wellbeing domain of the GNH questionnaire covers

three areas: general psychological distress indicators, emotional balance indicators, and

spirituality indicators. Elements like the prevalence rates of negative emotions (jealousy,

frustration, selfishness) and positive emotions (generosity, compassion, calmness), the practice

of spiritual activities like meditation and prayers, and overall life enjoyment are part of this



“The domain of time use is one of the most effective windows on quality of life as it analyzes the

nature of time spent within a 24-hour period, as well as activities that occupy longer periods of

time” (Ura, 2008). The time use domain highlights the value of non-work time for happiness and

overall quality of life. The domain was constructed under the assumption that non-work activities

such as “sleeping, personal care, community participation, education and learning, religious

activities, social and cultural activities, sports, leisure, and travel add to a rich life and contribute

to levels of happiness” (Ura, 2008). Even though the “measurement of time devoted to unpaid

work activities like care of children and sick members of a household, maintenance of

household, and others can provide a proxy measure of the contribution made by unpaid activities

to welfare,” the value of such activities are underestimated in most national accounts (Ura,



“The domain of community vitality focuses on the strengths and weaknesses of relationships and

interactions within communities. It examines the nature of trust, belongingness, vitality of caring

relationships, safety in home and community, and giving and volunteering” (Ura, 2008). The

domain consists of seven areas: family vitality, safety, reciprocity, trust, social support,

socialization, and kinship density.


“Maintenance of cultural traditions has been one of Bhutan’s primary policy goals, as traditions

and cultural diversity contributes to identity, values, and creativity” (Ura, 2008). This domain

considers the diversity and strength of cultural traditions through six areas: dialect use,

traditional sports, community festivals, artisan skill, value transmission, and basic precept.


“The health indicators assess the health status of the population, the determinants of health, and

the health system. Health status indicators show information on self-rated health, disabilities,

body-mass index, number of healthy days per month, knowledge about HIV transmission, and

breast feeding practices” (Ura, 2008). Barriers to health are also assessed according to the

walking distance to the nearest health facility and access to health services. The three areas in the

health domain are health status, health knowledge, and barriers to health.


“Education contributes to the knowledge, values, creativity, skills, and civic sensibility of

citizens” (Ura, 2008). The emphasis of the education domain is on the effectiveness of

contributing to collective wellbeing. The education domain consists of the following areas:

educational attainment, Dzongkha language, and folk and historical literacy.


“By examining the state of Bhutan’s natural resources, the pressures on ecosystems, and different

management responses, the domain of ecological diversity and resilience is intended to describe

the impact of domestic supply and demand on Bhutan’s ecosystems” (Ura, 2008). The ecology

domain mainly focuses on perceptual data on ecology, since most of the objective measurements

of ecological diversity and resilience are conducted by other environmental agencies. It uses

three areas: ecological degradation, ecological knowledge, and afforestation.


“The domain of living standard covers the basic economic status of the people. The indicators

assess the levels of income at the individual and household level, sense of financial security,

room ration, and house ownership” (Ura, 2008). The indicators also reflect economic hardships,

like inability to repair households and the purchase of second-hand clothing. The living standard

domain consists of four areas: income, housing, food security, and hardship.


“The domain of good governance evaluates how people perceive various government functions

in terms of their efficacy, honesty, and quality. The themes… include human rights, leadership at

various levels of government, performance of government in delivering services and controlling

inequality and corruption, and peoples’ trust in the media, the judiciary, and the police” (Ura,

2008). The three areas of the good governance domain are: government performance, freedom,

and institutional trust.

Policy Making Based on GNH

The Gross National Happiness Commission (GNHC) is the planning branch of the government,

and they use the information that the GNH index reveals to construct policies that promote GNH.

The GNHC develops most of the policies and programs in Bhutan, and they are increasingly

using the information from the GNH index to channel resources to the areas and issues where

they are most needed.

GNH and its Challenges

Bhutan is indeed a living example of a society where the distinct culture has a strong influence

on not only how the country is governed, but also how the country moves forward in their efforts

to join the community of industrialized nations. They have actively opened a dialogue that

addresses questions such as, “What is progress? What matters to us as a society? How do we

measure it? How do we use statistics to shape institutions and policies?” As does any other

country in the South Asian region and other developing regions of the world, Bhutan faces many

social, economic, and political challenges. But what differentiates Bhutan from other nations is

that it uses an alternative approach to development by using Gross National Happiness as its

metric of progress and as the driver for policies in the country. This allows its cultural heritage

to remain intact as it embraces the globalization of the 21st century.

Comprehension Check-in

1. What fundamental questions should societies concerned about the wellbeing of their
citizens ask?

2. Why was the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) created?
3. How effective is the GDP at measuring progress?
4. Upon what principles did the King of Bhutan base the idea of Gross National Happiness


5. How did the Center for Bhutan Studies (CBS) develop the Gross National Happiness

6. What are the nine areas of focus in the GNH index?
7. What is the impact of GNH in Bhutan and globally?


Elliott, J. (1987, May 2). The modern path to enlightenment. Financial Times Weekend, p. 1.

Hall, J. (2009, July 20). The OECD’s global project on measuring the progress of societies.

Presentation at the First National Roundtable on Measuring Progress of Societies and Sustainable

Development, Bangkok, Thailand.

Salvaris, M. (2007, November). Democracy, happiness and progress measurement [PDF

document]. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Gross National Happiness,

Bangkok, Thailand. Retrieved from http://gnh-movement.org/papers/salvaris.pdf

Stiglitz, Joseph. (2009, August 22). Globalizing the GDP debate. Presentation at the Conference

on Thailand’s Future Beyond the Global Crisis: A Regional Platform Towards the Wellbeing

Society, Bangkok, Thailand.

Ura, K. (2008). Explanation of GNH index. Thimphu, Bhutan: The Center for Bhutan

Studies. Retrieved from http://gnhusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Karma-Ura-Explanation-


Credit: Adapted from Gross National Happiness in Bhutan: A Living Example of an Alternative

Approach to Progress, by Alejandro Adler Braun. Used with permission from Alejandro Adler

Braun. © Copyright 2012 Alejandro Adler. All Rights Reserved.