1. Read the MCT Template Instructions (PDF) first.
2. Read it carefully so you don’t make any mistakes and if you can’t understand what you’ve to do then ask me.
3. Read Case Study (Historic one PDF).
4. Then look at MCT Template Instructions again.
5. Start filling out the MCT template (Word Document).
You will be using the Management Consulting Template.
Here is some helpful information:
The Management Consulting Template (MCT) is a tool used by consultants to track their thinking and analysis in
order to come up with strong/best recommendations for the client based on the diagnostic tools/facts/critical
analysis/logic. The goal in MCT is to pick one of three options for the client and work it through the MCT and to
therefore have a persuasive argument in place. (Later when finished using the MCT the consultant would then use
the information within the template to write up a professional report. However. for this assignment we only
complete/deliver the MCT template itself). Send Individual Assignment 2 to [email protected]
Note some of the important aspects/pointers I typically expect/review/explain for this assignment:
i. What are the steps one should consider in Individual Assignment 2 of BUSI640- using the Management Consulting
Template (MCT)?
a. review the Case Study documents to understand the situation
b. select the diagnostic tools that will help you with diagnosis of the situation
c. think through b. with the help of those tools
d. come up with three options (Table 2) that you as the consultant decide are the best three options for the consultant
to overcome/improve the situation the client is facing
e. select only one of those three options as your preferred option
f. from that point on only answer the remaining tables in terms of the one preferred/selected option you chose.
Having done the above you would have now arrived now at Table 3
ii. What about critical issues and WNTBA?
For each of 3.1, 3.2 etc you now need to think through the question “what are the critical issues (problems or barriers,
etc) that will need to be addressed in order to achieve the one option I have selected/chosen? For each of the
sections (3.1, 3.2 etc) answer the questions for each of the critical issues you find for that section.
a. Table 3B
– Table 3b is closely connected to Table 3.1; 3.2; 3.3 etc
– the box in Table 3B that states “What Needs to Be Addressed” can be understood as a question “What needs to be
addressed in order to overcome/resolve the critical issue(s) that were found in Table 3.1; 3.2; 3.3 etc
b. Table 4
– Table 4.1; 4.2; 4.3 etc are closely connected to Tables 3B
– WNTBA is What Needs to Be Addressed
– the WNTBA Statements come from Table 3.1; 3.2; 3.3 etc
– having filled in the statements you now need to then find/decide on two solutions/ideas/alternatives (i.e. Alternative
#1; Alternative #2) for the client that best address/help solve each WNTBA
– having come up with two alternatives for each WNTBA, you now need to select one of the two alternatives as your
recommendation for each WNTBA and give the rationale as to why you chose that alternative (bottom box of 4.1; 4.2,
4.3 etc.)
c. The section of Table 5 is where the final recommendations and outcomes are written that result from the critical
analysis work you did in the earlier sections/tables leading up to Table 5.
d. Only the reference page is APA; type directly into the boxes; no other paper/documents etc are necessary beyond
the template other than the reference page and any appendices you decide to add; it is ok to use professional point
form but preferably in Tables 2 (the three options) use full sentences/paragraphs and give good detail as Tables 2 will
likely contain the most information and the other tables will be sentences and smaller sections/answers typically. This
is a critical analysis assignment where you show you have tracked your thinking, analysis, and recommendations
AND that they fit together.
Management Consulting Template
Student-Consultant Name:
___________________________________
Date of Template Submission:
_________________________
Table of Contents
4
Notes REGARDING PRIORITY LEVEL
5
Table 2.1 – Analysis of Strategic Options (Option 1)
6
Table 2.2 – Analysis of Strategic Options (Option 2)
7
Table 2.3 – Analysis of Strategic Options (Option 3)
10
Table 3.1 – Critical Issues in the Context of Recommended Strategic Option – (FINANCE)
11
Table 3.2 – Critical Issues in the Context of Recommended Strategic Option – (HR)
12
Table 3.3 – Critical Issues in the Context of Recommended Strategic Option – (IT/MIS)
13
Table 3.4 – Critical Issues in the Context of Recommended Strategic Option – (POM)
14
Table 3.5 – Critical Issues in the Context of Recommended Strategic Option – (MARKETING)
16
Table 3B – Development of What Need to Be Addressed Statements (5 OR 6)
(Finance; HR; IT/MIS; POM; Marketing; Other)
19
Table 4.1 – WNTBA 1: Evaluation of Alternative Solutions & Recommendation
20
Table 4.2 – WNTBA 2: Evaluation of Alternative Solutions & Recommendation
21
Table 4.3 – WNTBA 3: Evaluation of Alternative Solutions & Recommendation
22
Table 4.4 – WNTBA 4: Evaluation of Alternative Solutions & Recommendation
23
Table 4.5 – WNTBA 5: Evaluation of Alternative Solutions & Recommendation
25
Table 5 – Recommendation Detail # 1
26
Table 5 – Recommendation Detail # 2
27
Table 5 – Recommendation Detail # 3
26
Table 5 – Recommendation Detail # 4
27
Table 5 – Recommendation Detail # 5
Appendices / Tables
REFERENCES
Notes regarding priority level
· Table 5 – Priority: HI= High (Extremely important, very critical); ME= Medium (important but not critical); LO=Low (needs to be done but not important and/or critical) |
Table 2.1 – Analysis of Strategic Options
|
Option 1
|
Briefly Identify & Describe the Option
|
|
Benefits/ Advantages
|
|
Critical
Success
Factors
|
|
Threats/
Risks
|
|
Why is this your recommended Strategic Option?
|
Table 2.2 – Analysis of Strategic Options
|
Option 2
|
Briefly Identify & Describe the Option
|
|
Benefits/ Advantages
|
|
Critical
Success
Factors
|
|
Threats/
Risks
|
|
Why is this your recommended Strategic Option? |
Table 2.3 – Analysis of Strategic Options
|
Option 3
|
Briefly Identify & Describe the Option
|
|
Benefits/ Advantages
|
|
Critical
Success
Factors
|
|
Threats/
Risks
|
|
Why is this your recommended Strategic Option? |
NOT REQUIRED Table 2A – Strategic Analysis – Stakeholder Positions on Strategic Options
Stakeholders and their positions:
|
Strategic
Option 1:
|
Strategic
Option 2:
|
Strategic
Option 3:
|
Stakeholder 1:
|
|||
Stakeholder 2:
|
|||
Stakeholder 3:
|
|||
Stakeholder 4:
|
NOT REQUIRED Table 2B – Strategic Analysis – Impact of Critical Issues on Strategic Options
Strategic Options & Their Critical Issues |
Strategic Option #1 |
Strategic Option #2 |
Strategic Option #3 |
Finance
|
|
|
|
Marketing
|
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
|
IT
|
|
|
|
Human Resources
|
|
|
|
Table 3.1 – Critical Issues in the Context of Recommended Strategic Option – FINANCE
CRITICAL ISSUES
|
How is it manifested? |
Why is it happening? Cause(s)?
|
1) Why Important? 2) Implications if not dealt with? |
Finance
F1
|
|||
F2
|
|||
F3
|
|||
F4
|
|||
F5
|
Table 3.2 – Critical Issues in the Context of Recommended Strategic Option – HR
CRITICAL ISSUES
|
How is it manifested?
|
Why is it happening? Cause(s)? |
Why Important? Implications if not dealt with? |
Human
Resources
HR1
|
|||
HR2
|
|||
HR3
|
|||
HR4
|
|||
HR5
|
Table 3.3 – Critical Issues in the Context of Recommended Strategic Option – IT/MIS
CRITICAL ISSUES
|
How is it manifested?
|
Why is it happening? Cause(s)? |
Why Important? Implications if not dealt with? |
Info Tech
IT1
|
|||
IT2
|
|||
IT3
|
|||
IT4
|
|||
IT5
|
Table 3.4 – Critical Issues in the Context of Recommended Strategic Option – POM
CRITICAL ISSUES
|
How is it manifested?
|
Why is it happening? Cause(s)? |
Why Important? Implications if not dealt with? |
Operations
OP1
|
|||
OP2
|
|||
OP3
|
|||
OP4
|
|||
OP5
|
Table 3.5 – Critical Issues in the Context of Recommended Strategic Option – MARKETING
CRITICAL ISSUES
|
How is it manifested?
|
Why is it happening? Cause(s)? |
Why Important? Implications if not dealt with? |
Marketing
M1
|
|||
M2
|
|||
M3
|
|||
M4
|
|||
M5
|
NOT REQUIRED Table 3A – Vertical Causal Analysis
Description of Underlying Cause (Common causes for multiple problems) |
Critical Issue(s) Addressed (as identified in Table 3) |
Total Frequency |
Priority and Importance |
||
Low |
Med |
High |
|||
1. |
|
||||
2. |
|||||
3. |
|||||
4. |
|||||
5. |
|||||
6. |
|||||
7. |
|||||
8. |
|||||
9. |
|||||
10. |
Additional Issues or Insights which are critical to the success of the organization
OR will critically impact on the success of your recommended strategy
Table 3B – Development of What Need to Be Addressed Statements
1. What Needs to Be Addressed |
|
Implications if not Addressed |
Opportunities if Addressed |
2. What Needs to Be Addressed
|
|
Implications if not Addressed |
Opportunities if Addressed |
3. What Needs to Be Addressed
|
|
Implications if not Addressed |
Opportunities if Addressed |
4. What Needs to Be Addressed |
|
Implications if not Addressed |
Opportunities if Addressed |
5. What Needs to Be Addressed
|
|
Implications if not Addressed |
Opportunities if Addressed |
6. What Needs to Be Addressed
|
|
Implications if not Addressed |
Opportunities if Addressed |
Comment – Observations and Conclusions Regarding Diagnosis
Table 4.1 – Evaluation of Alternative Solutions & Recommendation
WNTBA Statement #1
|
||
Alternative #1 |
Pros |
Cons |
Alternative #2 (Note: Is there another major alternative?) |
Pros
|
Cons
|
Recommendation & Rationale |
Table 4.2 – Evaluation of Alternative Solutions & Recommendation
WNTBA Statement #2
|
||
Alternative #1 |
Pros |
Cons |
Alternative #2
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Recommendation & Rationale |
Table 4.3 – Evaluation of Alternative Solutions & Recommendation
WNTBA Statement #3
|
||
Alternative #1 |
Pros |
Cons |
Alternative #2
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Recommendation & Rationale |
Table 4.4 – Evaluation of Alternative Solutions & Recommendation
WNTBA Statement #4
|
||
Alternative #1 |
Pros |
Cons |
Alternative #2 (Note: Is there another major alternative?) |
Pros
|
Cons
|
Recommendation & Rationale |
Table 4.5 – Evaluation of Alternative Solutions & Recommendation
WNTBA Statement #5
|
||
Alternative #1 |
Pros |
Cons |
Alternative #2
|
Pros |
Cons |
Recommendation & Rationale |
Table 4.6 – Evaluation of Alternative Solutions & Recommendation
WNTBA Statement #6
|
||
Alternative #1 |
Pros |
Cons |
Alternative #2
|
Pros |
Cons |
Recommendation & Rationale |
Table 5 – Recommendation Detail
Recommendations & ST = 0 to 3 months, MT = 3 to 9 months Supporting Detail LT = 9 to 15 months, Immediate – 0 to 15 days |
Timing |
Priority (See Note to the Marker) |
Rec #1
|
||
Rec #1 – Critical Success Factors & Risks to be Managed |
||
Rec #2
|
||
Rec #2 – Critical Success Factors & Risks to be Managed |
Table 5 – Recommendation Detail
Recommendations & ST = 0 to 3 months, MT = 3 to 9 months Supporting Detail LT = 9 to 15 months, Immediate – 0 to 10 days |
Timing |
Priority |
Rec #3
|
||
Rec #3 – Critical Success Factors & Risks to be Managed |
||
Rec #4
|
||
Rec #4 – Critical Success Factors & Risks to be Managed |
Table 5 – Recommendation Detail
Recommendations & ST = 0 to 3 months, MT = 3 to 9 months Supporting Detail LT = 9 to 15 months, Immediate – 0 to 10 days |
Timing |
Priority |
Rec #5
|
||
Rec #5 – Critical Success Factors & Risks to be Managed |
||
Rec #6
|
||
Rec #6 – Critical Success Factors & Risks to be Managed |
OPTIONAL Table 1 – A SWOT+ Data Gathering Table (STRATEGY)
|
Strategy
|
Strengths/ Positives INT
|
|
Opportunities EXT
|
|
Threats EXT
|
|
Problems/
Challenges/ Weaknesses INT
|
OPTIONAL Table 1.1 – A SWOT+ Data Gathering Table (FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT)
|
Finance
|
Strengths/ Positives INT
|
|
Opportunities EXT
|
|
Threats EXT
|
|
Problems/
Challenges/ Weaknesses INT
|
OPTIONAL Table 1.2 – A SWOT+ Data Gathering Table (HR MANAGEMENT)
|
Human Resources
|
Strengths/ Positives INT
|
|
Opportunities EXT
|
|
Threats EXT
|
|
Problems/
Challenges/ Weaknesses
INT
|
OPTIONAL Table 1.3 – A SWOT+ Data Gathering Table (IT/MGT INFO SYSTEMS)
|
Information Technology
|
Strengths/ Positives INT
|
|
Opportunities EXT
|
|
Threats EXT
|
|
Problems/
Challenges/ Weaknesses
INT
|
OPTIONAL Table 1.4 – A SWOT+ Data Gathering Table (PRODUCTION OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT)
|
Operations
|
Strengths/ Positives INT
|
|
Opportunities EXT
|
|
Threats EXT
|
|
Problems/
Challenges/ Weaknesses INT
|
OPTIONAL Table 1.5 – A SWOT+ Data Gathering Table (MARKETING MANAGEMENT)
|
Marketing
|
Strengths/ Positives INT
|
|
Opportunities EXT
|
|
Threats EXT
|
|
Problems/
Challenges/ Weaknesses INT
|
Table 1.6 The Five Forces of Competition in the Industry |
|
Rivalry among Competing Sellers |
· |
Potential Entry of New Competitors |
· |
Competitive Pressures from Substitute Products |
· |
Competitive Pressures from Supplier Bargaining Power and Supplier-Seller Collaboration |
· |
Competitive Pressures from Seller-Buyer Collaboration and Bargaining |
· |
NOT REQUIRED Table 1.7 Industry Key Success Factors |
|
Technological related |
· |
Operations related |
· |
Distribution related |
· |
Marketing related |
· |
Skills related |
· |
Organizational capacity |
· |
Other |
· |
NOT REQUIRED Table 1.8 Industry Prospects and Overall Attractiveness |
|
Factors making the industry attractive |
· |
Factors making the industry unattractive |
· |
Special industry issues/problems |
· |
Profit outlook |
· |
Table 1.9 The Business Environment |
||
|
Opportunities |
Threats |
Political |
||
Economic |
||
Societal/Cultural |
||
Technological |
W24516
HISTORIC LUND RESORT AT KLA AH MEN: BUILDING SALES AND
HIRING APPROPRIATE MANAGEMENT
Elizabeth Bowker wrote this case solely to provide material for class discussion. The author does not intend to illustrate either effective
or ineffective handling of a managerial situation. The author may have disguised certain names and other identifying informat ion to
protect confidentiality.
This publication may not be transmitted, photocopied, digitized, or otherwise reproduced in any form or by any means without the
permission of the copyright holder. Reproduction of this material is not covered under authorization by any reproduction righ ts
organization. To order copies or request permission to reproduce materials, contact Ivey Publishing, Ivey Business School, Western
University, London, Ontario, Canada, N6G 0N1; (t) 519.661.3208; (e) [email protected]; www.iveycases.com. Our goal is to publish
materials of the highest quality; submit any errata to [email protected]
Copyright © 2022, Ivey Business School Foundation Version: 2022-01-25
In October 2018, Anthony George was the liaison between the Tla’amin Nation management team and the
historic Lund Resort at Kla ah men (the Resort) in British Columbia, Canada. George was the lead Tla’amin
representative for the Tla’amin Nation at the Resort, so it was his job to keep Tla’amin senior management
informed of all significant activities in the Resort. In late 2018, there was much to report. One day, as
George looked out over the Salish Sea to Vancouver Island, K’ómoks territory, thoughts about issues at the
Resort consumed him: The ice machine was leaking, which was not significant, but irritating. A server and
a housekeeper had both quit without notice, saying they were tired of the workplace gossip, which was
more concerning. The busy season was almost over, and there had been no decision yet on whether the
Resort would stay open for the winter; and there were not enough annual sales to make the Resort profitable.
Most pressing for George, however, the Resort was still without a full-time manager. Finding the right
manager for the Resort had been an ongoing issue and was the immediate concern for Tla’amin
management; increased sales would have to come later. A new manager would need to develop a sound
marketing strategy, with sales targets and improved marketing activities to meet those targets. They would
need to create stability among all the employees, Tla’amin and non-Indigenous alike, while prioritizing and
promoting Tla’amin Nation members. They would also need to build relationships with the Tla’amin
leadership, Tla’amin members, and the non-Indigenous community. It was a lot to expect of one person.
BACKGROUND
The Tla’amin was a fully independent Nation, whose final treaty agreement
1
had taken effect in April 2016,
making the Tla’amin Nation self-governing
2
over its land, resources, and citizens for the first time since the
1 There were four modern treaties in British Columbia: those between the government and the Nisga’a Nation, the Tsawwassen
First Nation, the five Maa-nulth First Nations, and the Tla’amin Nation. A treaty was a contract between two Nations that defined
rights and title. It had taken 113 years for the Nations to come to an agreement on the Nisga’a-Canada Treaty. Among other
things, this treaty covered taxation, jurisdiction, dispute resolution, governance, justice, and transition out of the Indian Act.
2 Indigenous Peoples had always practiced their own forms of governance and economic management and possessed unique
social systems. Colonial British and Canadian governments made most of these practices illegal, replacing them with a series
of laws, policies, and decisions based on a colonial and paternalistic approach, which culminated in the Indian Act. Indigenous
communities were now working to undo federally imposed systems of governance and administration in favour of Indigenous
self-governance. For more information, see Government of Canada, Crown Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada,
Page 2 W24516
nineteenth century. The Tla’amin Final Agreement (the Treaty) confirmed the Tla’amin Nation’s land base
(Tla’amin Land
3
), which included the land upon which the Lund Resort was situated (see Exhibit 1). The
Tla’amin Land did not include all Tla’amin Traditional Territory; however, under the Treaty, the Tla’amin
had regained access to their entire territory for the purposes of exercising their Aboriginal rights, including
hunting, fishing, and harvesting medicinal plants.
According to the standard practice in Canada, land held privately was never considered for treaty
settlement.
4
Along with the land settlement, governance, and taxation provisions, the Tla’amin Nation also
received cash as part of the total settlement package. The federal and provincial governments were
motivated to negotiate treaties to create stability; however, they were also motivated to pay as little as
possible in settlements. Ultimately this settlement caused significant conflict within the Tla’amin Nation,
as some members were keen to gain independence and compensation as soon as possible, and others wanted
to hold out for a better deal.
5
The Tla’amin People and Traditional Territory
The Tla’amin People’s Traditional Territory occupied an area over 400 square kilometres spanning the
northern part of British Columbia’s Sunshine Coast and extending down both sides of the Strait of Georgia,
part of the Salish Sea. The Tla’amin People’s economic and political systems and spirituality were based
on a relationship with the Traditional Territory of their ancestors and their unique relationship with the land.
In her book Written as I Remember It, Elder Elsie Paul wrote of the “beliefs my ancestors grew up with, to
be respectful to everything around you.”
6
Trading with neighbours up and down the coast served an
important economic and social function, and Paul explained that the Tla’amin were one with the Homalco
and Klahoose Peoples: “It was all shared. It was never, ever competition.”
7
These relationships remained
strong. In 2019, the Tla’amin community had over 1,100 members, with the majority living in the main
village site in Tla’amin, just north of Powell River. Like many First Nations, the population was young and
growing, and over 60 per cent of its members were under the age of forty.
Tla’amin Constitution and Treaty
In 2009, Tla’amin members ratified the Constitution of the Tla’amin Nation—binding its government to be
open, democratic, and accountable and to respect the rights and equality of all Tla’amin Citizens. The next
step was to complete the treaty negotiations, which had begun in 1994. This was polarizing for the community.
“Advancing Indigenous Self-Government,” Government of Canada, accessed March 31, 2021, https://www.rcaanc-
cirnac.gc.ca/eng/1100100032275/1529354547314.
3 The Tla’amin Land defined in the Tla’amin Final Agreement was 8,323 hectares, including Traditional Territory and waters
around the Powell River area; Lasqueti, Texada, and Cortes Islands; and the Comox Valley. See a complete copy of the
Tla’amin Treaty Settlement on the Tla’amin website: Final Agreement, Tla’amin Nation, April 5, 2016,
https://www.tlaamiNation.com/final-agreement/.
4 In the Supreme Court decision Tshilqot’in Nation v. British Columbia, “the Supreme Court was careful to note that the
declaration of Aboriginal title did not apply to ‘privately owned or underwater lands.’ In fact, title over such lands was not
asserted. Canadians’ sense of entitlement to these types of land likely prompted a narrower framing of issues. The stakes
would have been much greater had Aboriginal title affected private ownership and submerged lands.” John Borrows,
“Aboriginal Title and Private Property,” The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference
71 (2015), http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/sclr/vol71/iss1/5.
5 Brian Thom, “Reframing Indigenous Territories: Private Property, Human Rights and Overlapping Claims,” American Indian
Culture and Research Journal 38, no. 4 (2014): 3–28.
6 Elsie Paul, Written As I Remember It: Teachings (þm̃ s Taþaw) from the Life of a Sliammon Elder (Vancouver, BC: UBC
Press, 2014), 17.
7 Paul, Written As I Remember It, 69.
Page 3 W24516
Some members felt they were unprepared for independence; others said the Tla’amin Nation was settling for
too little, particularly with respect to the rights to control more of their Traditional Territory, but self-
governance and certainty with respect to land and resources was a powerful motivator.
Tla’amin Hegus Clint Williams said, “I’m proud of my community for choosing a path of change, that while
difficult at times, provides us with a new beginning as a self-governing Nation free of the Indian Act.”
8
Paul
articulated some of the misgivings: “There’s proof everywhere that our people lived in all these different
locations, all around the territory. Yeah. So what we’re getting is a very small portion, I feel. Very, very small.”
9
On April 11, 2014, after many years of work and negotiation, the Tla’amin Nation signed a final agreement
with the governments of British Columbia (BC) and Canada, achieving a final agreement in principle and
signalling the start of a two-year period, ending April 4, 2016, when the Tla’amin Nation officially
transitioned into self-government. The Tla’amin Final Agreement freed the Tla’amin from Canada’s Indian
Act
10
and enabled the Nation to be self-governing, independent from Canadian oversight, and guided by its
own constitution. It was only the fourth modern treaty signed with a BC First Nation. The treaty was
approved by Tla’amin Citizens with a slim 51 per cent majority.
After the Treaty
The Tla’amin Nation gained a great deal of management capacity through the treaty settlement process and
then focused those skills and energy on business development and entrepreneurial ventures. This focus led
to a diverse revenue stream for the Tla’amin People and near full employment for the hundreds of Tla’amin
workers living locally. The Tla’amin Nation owned a substantial asset base that was uncontested, and it
was active in taking back control of its lands and resources. It also established a complex business
development structure designed to insulate its government from business risks and liabilities; to mitigate
complex tax implications related to own-source revenue;
11
and to provide a sound governance structure,
with established reporting requirements to enhance accountability. The new general manager would need
to work within this reporting structure.
In 2019, in addition to the Lund Resort and its ancillary businesses (see Exhibit 3), Tla’amin business
operations included a very profitable sustainable forestry business, Thichum Forest Products. There was
also aquaculture (oysters and geoduck clams) and fishing, including participation in the Pacific Integrated
Commercial Fisheries Initiative, which encouraged sustainable Indigenous commercial fisheries. The most
significant future business prospect was the development of the 324-hectare (800-acre) land parcel known
as the Powell River Sliammon Catalyst Lands (PRSCL), which had been divided into three parcels: some
went to the City of Powell River, some was held for residential development for the Tla’amin Nation, and
8 Chris Bolster, “Tla’amin Nation Celebrates New Era of Self-Governance,” Powell River Peak, April 7, 2016,
https://www.coastreporter.net/local-news/tlaamin-Nation-celebrates-new-era-of-self-governance-3398474.
9 Paul, Written As I Remember It, 72.
10 The Indian Act was “a Canadian federal law that governs in matters pertaining to Indian [Aboriginal] status, bands, and
Indian reserves. Throughout history it has been highly invasive and paternalistic, as it authorizes the Canadian federal
government to regulate and administer in the affairs and day-to-day lives of registered Indians and reserve communities.” First
Nations Studies Program, “The Indian Act,” Indigenous Foundations UBC, accessed March 31, 2021,
https://indigenousfoundations.arts.ubc.ca/the_indian_act/.
11 The Government of Canada defined own-source revenue (OSR) as follows:
the revenue that an Aboriginal government raises by collecting taxes and resource revenues or by generating
business and other income. Under self-government agreements, Aboriginal governments use some of this revenue
to contribute to the costs of their own operations, such as providing programs and services to their citizens. Many
Indigenous groups can generate OSR.
Government of Canada, “Own-Source Revenue for Self-Governing Groups,” Crown Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs
Canada, accessed March 31, 2021, https://www.rcaanc-cirnac.gc.ca/eng/1354117773784/1539869378991#sec1.
Page 4 W24516
some was to be developed for sale in the future. The PRSCL built on the Klahanie and Southview real estate
leases, offering prime, affordable waterfront lots, with pre-paid ninety-nine-year leases and residential and
commercial construction services.
Tla’amin planning had always been long-term, with an outlook that stretched multiple generations and both
respected the ancestors and considered responsibility to future generations. To achieve its goals, the
Tla’amin Nation engaged in strategic partnerships and joint ventures with non-Indigenous business partners
across the region and beyond, in tourism, real estate development, and forestry. Its diverse pool of assets in
natural resources and a significant land base provided many opportunities for partnerships in both the public
and private sectors.
THE RESORT
The historic Lund Resort at Kla ah men was wholly owned by the Tla’amin Nation and operated by Tla’amin
Management Services LP (TMS), the economic development arm of the Tla’amin Nation (see Exhibit 2).
Ultimately, the Nation and its governing bodies were accountable to the Tla’amin Citizens. The Resort was a
highly visible symbol of business success for the Tla’amin Nation, although by no means its only marker. The
Resort needed to be a good source of income and a foundation for further development of a tourism-based
economy. As well as being a major source of employment for the Nation, it offered an opportunity to build
management capacity, thereby further expanding the Tla’amin Nation’s business potential.
The Tla’amin Nation had purchased the Resort in 1996 through a joint venture with a private owner; the owner
held the management role while the Tla’amin Nation held 51 per cent of the shares. In March 2016, one month
before the Treaty was implemented, the Tla’amin Nation purchased the remaining 49 per cent of the shares
and assumed full operation of the Resort, to be administered by TMS and its directors. The Resort had a series
of short-term managers, and management became focused on creating stability and improving profitability.
CONTEXT
The Resort was located at the northern tip of the Salish Sea, north of Powell River (Tiskwat) at the gateway
to the renowned Desolation Sound, part of Tla’amin Land. It was one of the world’s most beautiful and
pristine environments. This area had been home to the Tla’amin People for many thousands of years. As
Paul described, “Our people lived on the coast and lived off the land. And they lived off the clams. And
people just lived everywhere in nature This is where our ancestors were, from ever so long ago.”
12
The Resort was originally built by the Swedish Thulin brothers during the colonial era, in 1895. It served
as the heart of the Lund community, which had previously been called Kla ah men and was one of several
historic village sites of the Tla’amin People. Since it was built, it had remained the largest employer in
Lund and the largest and most high-profile building. It became a natural place for the community to come
together or to share information.
The Resort was accessible by road, ferry, boat, and sea plane. It featured thirty-one renovated guest rooms,
which ranged from budget-friendly units to luxury ocean-front suites, all of which offered clean, bright
decor and modern amenities. In 2018, luxury waterfront room rates ranged from CA$199
13
to $350 per
night, including breakfast, during the summer season. Other rooms were $125–$225 per night, depending
12 Paul, Written As I Remember It, 72.
13 All dollar amounts are in Canadian dollars.
Page 5 W24516
on the season. The Resort had both a pub and a restaurant, where guests could enjoy the large decks and
spectacular views of Malaspina Strait. The general store offered a quintessential town store experience,
with fresh produce, deli service, camping gear, hardware, and liquor sales. Perched on the edge of the ocean,
the Lund Resort offered a special experience for its guests. It overlooked a busy dock and gas bar (both
owned by TMS), which serviced work boats, fish boats, locals, and tourists (see Exhibit 3).
The Resort’s peak season was from May to September, followed by an off-season from October to April,
when reduced sales made it necessary to lay off many staff. During the peak season, there were
approximately eighty employees at the Resort; a little over one-quarter were Tla’amin Nation members. In
the winter, employment dropped to approximately thirty people. Winter lay-offs were a standard procedure
in the hospitality industry and were understood by seasonal staff, such as students. However, for local
people with families and other responsibilities, the lay-offs could be problematic.
In 2016, the Tla’amin Nation kept the Resort open through the winter, although it lost money for that season,
with an occupancy rate near 20 per cent. It was closed through the winter in 2017. During the peak season,
occupancy was 85 per cent, while it was 40–60 per cent during the shoulder seasons (April–July and
September–November). In 2018, TMS had forecasted that the Resort would become a profitable, financially
sustainable, year-round operation in the following two to five years. Doing so would require considerable
marketing efforts to attract enough visitors as well as a broader, more diverse clientele.
Most guests came from the Pacific West Coast, including Vancouver and Seattle, although many travelled from
as far away as England, Scotland, Germany, China, and beyond. Guests tended to be over fifty, professional,
and well-travelled. The Resort was at the very end of the scenic Highway 101, so visitors came as far as they
could by car to enjoy the views and the wild West Coast, while still staying in luxurious and comfortable
accommodations. Increasingly, guests travelled by boat, and there were plans to increase float-plane access.
EXPLORING THE ISSUES
The Resort
George noted that some Tla’amin People believed the Nation was unprepared to manage the Resort, and
many had opinions about running the Resort, which they were not shy about expressing. This created an
additional challenge for George and the new general manager. The questions around the Resort’s operations
and the management difficulties contributed to a strong feeling among the Tla’amin leadership that the
Resort needed to be a noticeable success. This would build confidence and show that the Nation was
prepared to be independent of the federal government and the Indian Act and was operating with good
governance; it would indirectly suggest that signing the treaty had been the right thing to do. The Tla’amin
Nation was now free to put its time, money, and energy into economic development activities, such as the
Resort, and into community management, including culture, language, education, and health.
Management
The Resort had had six general managers in two years, and it needed a highly experienced professional,
who the leadership hoped to retain for at least three years. Given the complex reporting structure, the right
person would have to be adaptive and willing to work with multiple people within the Tla’amin leadership.
The manager would have to observe protocols they might not be familiar with and show deference to Elders
and other people who might not seem to have direct roles in the Resort. They would also need to be willing
to build management capacity in Tla’amin Nation employees, developing employees’ skills in
Page 6 W24516
communications, staff management, organization, negotiation, and accounting, and promoting proficiency
in many of the positions in the Resort. While it would have been best to hire a manager with experience
working with Indigenous communities, the TMS determined that this would be difficult; they would at least
have to hire someone who was experienced and who was open to learning about Tla’amin culture.
The Resort needed to be run in a way that respected Tla’amin values: a profound respect for nature and a
desire to create a sustainable refuge in this remote coastal community. Of course, the new general manager
would also have to be willing to move to a small community, where the smallest detail of their life might
be interesting to others. With support from the senior management team, George would provide the new
general manager with the time and support necessary to learn the ways of the Tla’amin Nation. The TMS
management team appreciated the way George had kept them informed and up to date and had effectively
managed senior relationships and internal politics.
George was considering several options for recruiting the general manager. First, he could employ a Resort
management agency, which would send skilled general managers on an as-needed basis and could do so
without delay. These managers would always be well trained and very experienced, but the Tla’amin
leadership had done this in the past and found that such managers were impatient and had a very corporate
mindset; they had not been sufficiently willing to learn Tla’amin ways and culture. Perhaps George could
find a different company that might send people who were more sensitive. Second, George could promote
a Tla’amin person already working at the Resort and could offer them training and mentoring to build their
capacity and leadership skills. This would take considerable time and effort, since there was not currently
someone who was almost ready; however, such a person would be an excellent fit and would have the
respect of the rest of the staff. Third, he could retain a recruiter, who would spend considerable time looking
for the right person. A recruiter could likely identify someone with good experience and the right
personality—probably more quickly than George could himself—but this person probably would not have
experience working in an Indigenous community. Finally, George could do the recruiting himself, using
word-of-mouth and online advertising platforms such as LinkedIn. This would certainly lead him to
someone with the right experience, who would fit in well and be a good cultural fit with the community—
but George still was not sure he would find someone with experience working in an Indigenous community.
Employee Recruitment and Retention
Locating, hiring, and retaining good workers was a chronic problem in the hospitality industry, partly
because work was often seasonal and many people required steady, year-round employment. At the Resort,
this led to high turnover, which created an unstable environment.
14
As the Resort was at the end of the road
in a small town, there were only so many local people available to work. Bringing people in from out of
town could be challenging, but to address the problem, the Resort specifically built accommodations for up
to twenty employees. Most new hires typically required training.
A more complex option was to develop talent from within the Tla’amin Nation; Tla’amin Citizens were
indirectly part owners of the Resort, and employing Tla’amin members was a priority for the Nation. These
people could help build the Tla’amin tourism economy and could develop into future leaders for the Nation
in a variety of capacities, including managing other Tla’amin-owned businesses. This made training and
retaining Tla’amin employees—some of whom had very little prior experience—especially important.
14 The ADP Research Institute reported that the average monthly turnover rate in the industry was 4.4 per cent in 2019, while
in the workforce as a whole, it was only 3.2 per cent. Ahu Yildirmaz, Christopher Ryan, and Jeff Nezaj, 2019 State of the
Workforce Report: Pay, Promotions and Retention, ADP Research Institute, April 16, 2019, https://www.adpri.org/assets/2019-
state-of-the-workforce-report/.
Page 7 W24516
Marketing
It was important that the Resort reflect the Tla’amin People and culture. To create an authentic and
memorable experience, the Resort’s development needed to be driven by the values of the Tla’amin Nation
and to reflect the meaning of the name Kla ah men: “a place of refuge.” As a start, in 2018 a Coast Salish
art project that showed the deep history of the Tla’amin People in this place was implemented in the
redesign of the rooms and the rebranding of the Resort. In order to increase the number of room nights, the
Resort needed to encourage visitors to eat and stay overnight—and to think of the Resort as a destination.
This meant developing eco-adventure and spa activities to keep people busy.
In 2018, the Resort was mostly full in the summer but needed to extend bookings into the spring and fall
shoulder seasons. Since the Resort had the benefit of several different room types, it was also possible to
attract more diverse visitors for work or other reasons. There were also opportunities to attract more
millennials and adventure tourists of all ages: there were plans to develop a high-end “glamping” experience
nearby as well as a cannabis shop that would emphasize health and wellness. Nonetheless, the Resort still
needed to serve temporary workers who were employed nearby, often in blue-collar positions, and who
required lower rates.
Relationships with the Local Non-Indigenous Community
Citing posts on community Facebook groups and personal interactions, George and the Tla’amin leadership
noted that not everyone in the non-Indigenous community had been happy when the Tla’amin Nation took
over the operation of the Resort and its ancillary businesses, even though the Nation had been a majority
owner for two decades. Some local non-Indigenous people said it was going to cost jobs and contracts,
while others were simply opposed to more First Nations influence in any manner. They complained on
social media of “Indians getting handouts,” “living in the past,” and “spending my tax dollars.”
15
None of
these comments acknowledged Tla’amin ancestral rights or all that the Tla’amin had been required to give
up in the treaty negotiation.
The Tla’amin Nation had taken over operations of the adjacent parking lot contract, and this was particularly
contentious, even though the Nation owned it and had the right to run the operation. Some considered the
lot to be public land rather than a Tla’amin asset. There were similarly high emotions around the historic
photos that had hung in the Resort. The Tla’amin Nation had spent a lot of money on restoration and had
decided to remove most of these photos, since they did not in any way reflect Tla’amin culture and did not
even show any Tla’amin People. Some non-Indigenous locals felt this was an insult to their history. A
gesture was made to showcase some of the photos in the community hall nearby.
George noted that some local non-Indigenous people also complained that the success of the Resort and its
restaurants—a big employer and a focal point in the community—might represent too much competition
and hurt other small businesses in the area. These people expressed concerns that the Tla’amin were being
unfair to people who had lived in Lund for decades, and they felt that their history was being challenged.
16
Those complaining seemed not to notice that the Tla’amin Nation was reclaiming territory that had been its
own since time immemorial and was actively building the local economy, which would benefit everyone.
Much of the opposition was voiced in private and on social media, but some of it, including vandalism to
the parking lot, was direct and confrontational. George and others felt very hurt by the racism and
15 Anonymous Facebook posts from 2016.
16 These complaints were made on Facebook and were still available for viewing as of September 2020.
Page 8 W24516
resentment directed at the Tla’amin Nation and the Resort management, who had done so much work to
build relationships within the community. They offered personal invitations to the pub and held a grand
opening specifically for the local community. Resort management met with local businesses to develop
joint marketing initiatives. George said, “We’ve bent over backwards. That’s just the way our people are.”
With the signing of the treaty, the Tla’amin Nation held unambiguous power in the region, and the work of
building strong relationships was ongoing.
CONCLUSION
George and the Tla’amin leadership had a lot of work to do to make the Resort run smoothly, continue to
serve the needs of the Nation and the broader community, and turn a profit. They had to improve the
Resort’s financial performance so the operation would become more profitable. They needed to attend to
employee training and retention, especially for Tla’amin Nation members, in order to run the Resort
effectively and develop management capacity within the Nation. They also needed to improve marketing,
to bring in more customers—especially at times of year when sales were soft—and to put more work into
creating a superior customer experience. This would also help with marketing, as happy visitors would
become marketing assets for the business through word of mouth. The plan was that new people would
come and stay longer, enjoying the magic of Lund and Desolation Sound for a few days, just as the Tla’amin
People had since time immemorial. And finally, they urgently needed to find a general manager, who would
ensure the Resort would be profitable and run smoothly well into the future.
Page 9 W24516
EXHIBIT 1: TLA’AMIN AREA
Source: Government of Canada, Tla’amin Nation, Government of British Columbia, “Appendix A: Map of Tla’amin Area,” in
Tla’amin Final Agreement Appendices, 1, November 27, 2012, https://www.tlaamiNation.com/wp-
content/uploads/2016/08/TLA_AMIN_FINAL_AGREEMENT_APPENDICES_NOV_29_2013 ENGLISH.pdf.
Page 10 W24516
EXHIBIT 2: TLA’AMIN GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE
Source: Tla’amin Nation, Tla’amin Nation Annual Report, 2018-2019, accessed December 13, 2019,
https://www.tlaaminnation.com/2018-2019-annual-report-and-financial-statements/.
Page 11 W24516
EXHIBIT 3: TLA’AMIN BUSINESS OPERATIONS AS OF 2019
In 2019, Tla’amin business operations included the following:
Thichum Forest Products, with a heavy emphasis on sustainable development
Aquaculture for oysters and geoduck clams
Land development, including the 324-hectare (800-acre) parcel known as the Powell River Sliammon
Catalyst Lands, which had been divided into three parcels, some going to the City of Powell River,
some to be held for residential development for the Tla’amin Nation, and some to be developed for sale
in the future
Klahanie and Southview real estate leases—offering prime, affordable waterfront lots with pre-paid
ninety-nine-year leases
Construction services (residential and commercial)
Fishing, including participation in the Pacific Integrated Commercial Fisheries Initiative for sustainable
Aboriginal commercial fisheries
The Lund Resort and its ancillary businesses, including the restaurant, gift shop, market, and marina
Source: Tla’amin Nation, Tla’amin Nation Annual Report, 2018-2019, accessed December 13, 2019,
https://www.tlaaminnation.com/2018-2019-annual-report-and-financial-statements/.